Crossroads
October 4, 2010 2:12 PM

Kagan Leaves a Mark on Her First Day

The Supreme Court's newest Justice Elena Kagan stands for photographs after her formal investiture ceremony at the Supreme Court in Washington, Friday, Oct. 1, 2010.

(Credit: AP)
There's been a lot of hyped-up consternation about whether Elena Kagan was ready to be a justice. Among the nine, she is the only justice who hadn't first been an appeals court judge, and so the chatter among critics is that she would struggle because her learning curve was steep.

Ahem. No.

In her first case as a sitting justice this morning, Kagan came off like a seasoned, savvy pro. She hit lawyers with precise questions that weren't unduly aggressive, and she made her points. What's more, she showed why many people think she'll be a true force on the Court: She effectively drew in other the justices with her questions--asking a follow up to a question by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for example, and then striking true gold by piquing the interest of human jump ball Justice Anthony Kennedy.

When Justice Kennedy perks up and tells a lawyer, " I want to know your answer to Justice Kagan's question," that means one thing. Justice Kagan is having a Very Good Day.

I was curious how Kagan would conduct herself today, because new justices have different strategies. Justice Samuel Alito, for example, consciously and deliberately decided to hold back his first year, just to get a lay of the land and show his respect as the junior justice. After that first year, many assumed he was quiet, unassuming, reserved Justice Alito. But of course he wasn't. After his first year, Alito started to boldly jump in, and he's now one of the Court's most effective and insightful questioners at oral argument.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, on the other hand, showed no restraint. From the beginning, she has been vocal and somewhat aggressive--to the point that it caused a few raised eyebrows among some of her new colleagues.

Kagan split the difference, and she was impressive. Her questions were clear, concise and exactly on point. She pulled together various points other justices were making, and her demeanor was at once sincere and respectful, yet also forceful and confident.

Granted, it was just the first case on the first day. And the case--a technical, somewhat trivial bankruptcy dispute--wasn't much to speak of. Reading too much into it would be like saying Boise State should be #1 because they beat Virginia Tech to start the season. (Ahem. No.)

But it was a good start for the newest justice. If you're a liberal who hopes she will be an intellectual force who builds coalitions, you had to like what you saw. And if you're a conservative, you had reasons to feel nervous.

Tags:
Elena Kagan ,
First Monday in October ,
Supreme Court ,
Anthony Kennedy
Topics:
Supreme Court ,
Crossroads

Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
by gina647 October 5, 2010 11:46 AM EDT
Yes, she's so wonderful.. too bad she had to excuse herself from hearing 1/2 the cases... she is another obama failure that will be with the USA for a long time
Reply to this comment
by antiglobal5 October 5, 2010 9:17 AM EDT
"Kagan Leaves a Mark on Her First Day" Where, in her white tighty whiteys?
Reply to this comment
by stormerF3 October 5, 2010 7:48 AM EDT
Does she only have one blue tent to wear?
Reply to this comment
by magik13 October 4, 2010 8:17 PM EDT
yep...sure did. I am throwing around the word "narcissism" ...except I know what I am talking about. Narcissism is the American disease and afflicts all Americans. Americans that do not turn within to heal their narcissism will be full of regret and fear on their death bed for living a shallow, meaningless life and for pissing away their country. You need to learn how to spell dude.
Reply to this comment
by Will_Feral_Cat October 4, 2010 5:50 PM EDT
Wow magik13, did you learn a new word at school today. How many times can you use narcissist in a sentance or in this whole freakin blog?
Reply to this comment
by Citizen1313 October 4, 2010 5:44 PM EDT
Please be more respectful when you dissagre with someone. No need to call anyone stupid or make unqualified sugggestions about their IQ. You are simply embarrassing the Democratic Party you are vainly attempting to protect. It is far more productive to debate the points versus attacting people.
Reply to this comment
by magik13 October 4, 2010 8:21 PM EDT
I disagree. This is why the Democrats are losing and why they frequently lose once they gain power. It's called passivity. Whereas Republicans are the aggressive party of narcissists, Democrats are the party of co-dependents and passive aggressives. How many times have we lost because we did not hit the immoral repubs back at their own low level? (ie..swift boat). And the low IQ comment is a fact...proven by several recent scientific studies that correlate IQ with political party identification. My words are strong for sure...but not out of line with American political discourse. I fight the repubs at their own low level....nothing else works. They are too primitive to understand anything else.
by jd2408 October 5, 2010 10:08 AM EDT
Behaving like an adult that has an IQ is not a bad thing. When someone has an opinion that you don't agree with, making sound intelligent points helps to give others another point of view to consider. Child like behavior is a turn off and people don't take your points seriously. I agree with Citizen, it does reflect on the Party you favor.
by pragmatist1 October 4, 2010 4:59 PM EDT
...I'm sure many were also impressed with the fact that she was able to string big words together in a cogent sentence...
Reply to this comment
by doctor_know October 4, 2010 7:25 PM EDT
She was?
by stormerF3 October 5, 2010 7:51 AM EDT
I know Omar the blue tent maker was.
by magik13 October 4, 2010 4:40 PM EDT
The difference between Kagan and Alito and Roberts is about 50 IQ points. Kagan is far more intellectually astute than either Alito or Roberts. Alito is a dullard and comes off as sort of stupid and narcissistic. Alito "waited out" his first year to create an "appearance of deference". Like all "conservative narcissists" and false selves, Alito had to try to paint an image in the minds of the other Justices whereas Kagan can just be her own brilliant Self. Bravo Justice Kagan. Thumbs down to Scalito and Roberts who gave away our electoral power to the corporations and republican benefactors. They are criminals yet sit as Justices on the SC.
Reply to this comment
by Empire_George_ October 4, 2010 4:43 PM EDT
magik13, Kagan isn't qualified to adjust the robes of Alito or Roberts.....their legal expertise, intelligence and judicial experience goes far beyond Kagan....who has Zero judicial experience.
by patocc123 October 4, 2010 4:45 PM EDT
You both know this how? Oh cause MSNBC and Fox told you. Gotcha.
by knowerseeker October 4, 2010 4:18 PM EDT
I don't know and couldn't care less how "experienced" she is. What I care about is that she is an LGB advocate, and possibly a lesbian herself. And I don't like that.
Reply to this comment
by pragmatist1 October 4, 2010 4:59 PM EDT
...anything goes with the left leaning...
by doctor_know October 4, 2010 7:20 PM EDT
You should be ashamed of yourself. You are no better than those who didn't want women or non-whites to have a vote. Just like them your views are 'last-century' and are rapidly evolving out of the human 'meme'-pool.... Fair-well my outdated friend.
by GovIsNotTheAnswer October 4, 2010 3:50 PM EDT
She leaves a mark alrighty, a skid mark in the shorts of Lady Justice. I wonder how she will vote with the Wise Latina on the next gun issue. Considering she said the same thing the Latina said in the hearings and then the Latina voted the exact opposite of her lying answer in the hearing. Anyone notice when Kagan was a Solicitor General she sure went out of her way to make sure none of the birthers lawsuits went anywhere. I am not a birther myself but it is very curious considering how much effort has been expended to make sure we all have no idea just how smart our wonderful leader is via his records. Obama is a real open pamphlet let me tell ya. Something tells me someone with a swollen an ego as Obama would be sending out copies of his records to everyone if he really had the grades to back up the baseless unproven claims about his intelligence.
Reply to this comment
by Barbara1014 October 4, 2010 6:58 PM EDT
"a skid mark in the shorts of Lady Justice"??? How old are you, 12? Public discourse rises above toilet references once you're out of high school. Try it Gov-is-not-the-answer. Rambling monologue about nothing...you dont even know what the question is. The birther thing went nowhere, exactly as it should. Absurd accusations aren't gennerally dignified with a response outside the school yard.
by ToolMangler1 October 4, 2010 7:57 PM EDT
Obama's IQ has been estimated anywhere from 110-165. He is a graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School, where he served as editor, and later as president of the Harvard Law Review; which is an extremely prestigious position. Obama also taught at the University of Chicago for over 10 years, (How long have you taught, and where????)
See all 24 Comments

About Crossroads

Follow the trails, travails and decision points in law, politics and culture in America with CBS News Chief Legal Correspondent Jan Crawford. A newspaper reporter-turned television journalist and a best-selling author and lawyer, Crawford tracks the stories big and small that touch our lives--and whatever else she happens to get fired up about. She grew up on a cattle farm near Ryan's Crossroads, Alabama, and is a graduate of the University of Alabama and University of Chicago Law School.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
CBS News on Facebook